LEADERSHIP AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN HYBRID MANAGEMENT IN THE CONDITIONS OF GLOBALIZATION

Kiykov Oleksii

Abstract


The article explores the interaction of leadership and artificial intelligence in hybrid management, with a focus on socio-philosophical aspects in the context of globalization. It examines the integration of technological tools such as artificial intelligence and big data through the lens of transformational and service leadership. The role of leaders in maintaining the ethical and social balance between technological efficiency and human values is a crucial aspect of the social philosophy of management. In the digital transformation era, hybrid management provides practical solutions to balance global economic demands and human capital needs. The philosophical understanding of these processes is based on the concepts of technological determinism and humanistic management, which help to understand the impact of artificial intelligence on management processes and the social structure of organizations. The article also analyzes how globalization is changing leadership models, reinforcing the importance of social responsibility and adaptability in the face of uncertainty. This study contributes to the understanding of how hybrid management can be an effective tool for addressing global challenges while upholding ethical and social principles of management, with practical implications for leaders and managers in various industries.

Keywords: hybrid management, artificial intelligence, social philosophy, globalization, transformational leadership, service leadership, technological determinism, humanistic management.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Андрущенко, В.П. (2005) Філософія освіти ХХІ століття: пошук пріоритетів. Філософія освіти, Вип.1, 5–17.

Андрущенко, В.П., Савельєв, В.Л. (2010) Освітня політика (огляд порядку денного). Київ: «МП Леся». 368.

Бех, Ю.В. (2012) Філософія управління соціальними системами : монографія. Київ: Вид-во НПУ імені М. П. Драгоманова. 623.

Вашкевич, В.М., Кивлюк, О.П. (2019) Екстерналізація освітніх послуг як шлях до розвитку освіти. Збірник матеріалів ІІІ Міжнародної науково-практичної конференції «Концептуальні, методологічні та практичні проблеми соціальної філософії, філософії освіти та освітньої політики», Київ. 16–19.

Осипенко, Л.О. (2013) Філософія управління як нова парадигма керування складними соціально-економічними системами. Гуманітарний вісник Запорізької державної інженерної академії. № 52.189–199.

Battilana, J., Lee, M. (2014) Advancing research on hybrid organizing – Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals. Vol. 8, №1. 397–441.

Besharov, M.L., Smith, W.K. (2014) Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 39, №3. 364–381.

Denis, J.-L., Langley, A., Rouleau L. (2007) Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames. Human Relations. Vol. 60, №1. 179–215.

Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J., Mair, J. (2014) The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol. 34. 81–100.

Haigh, N., Hoffman, A.J. (2012) Hybrid organizations: The next chapter of sustainable business. Organizational Dynamics. Vol. 41, №2. 126–134.

Jay, J. (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 56, №1. 137–159.

Kraatz, M.S., Block, E.S. (2008) Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism/ Eds. R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, K. Sahlin-Andersson. London: Sage, 243–275.

Pache, A.-C., Santos, F. (2013) Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 56, №4. 972–1001.

Smith, W.K., Gonin, M., Besharov, M.L. (2013) Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly. Vol. 23, №3. 407–442.

Terepyshchyi, S. (2017) Educational Landscape as a Concept of Philosophy of Education. Studia Warmińskie, Vol. 54, 373-383.

References:

Andrushchenko, V.P. (2005) Filosofiia osvity ХХІ stolittia: poshuk priorytetiv [Philosophy of education for the 21st century: the search for priorities] . Filosofiia osvity, Vyp.1, 5–17. [in Ukrainian].

Andrushchenko, V.P., Saveliev, V.L. (2010) Osvitnia polityka (ohliad poriadku dennoho) [Education Policy (Agenda Review)]. Kyiv: «MP Lesia». 368. [in Ukrainian].

Bekh, Yu.V. (2012) Filosofiia upravlinnia sotsialnymy systemamy [Philosophy of management of social systems]: monohrafiia. Kyiv: Vyd-vo NPU imeni M.P. Drahomanova. 623. [in Ukrainian].

Vashkevych, V.M., Kyvliuk, O.P. (2019) Eksternalizatsiia osvitnikh posluh yak shliakh do rozvytku osvity [Outsourcing of educational services as a way to develop education]. Zbirnyk materialiv III Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii «Kontseptualni, metodolohichni ta praktychni problemy sotsialnoi filosofii, filosofii osvity ta osvitnoi polityky», Kyiv. 16–19. [in Ukrainian].

Osypenko, L.O. (2013) Filosofiia upravlinnia yak nova paradyhma keruvannia skladnymy sotsialno-ekonomichnymy systemamy [Management philosophy as a new paradigm for managing complex socio-economic systems]. Humanitarnyi visnyk Zaporizkoi derzhavnoi inzhenernoi akademii. № 52.189–199. [in Ukrainian].

Battilana, J., Lee, M. (2014) Advancing research on hybrid organizing – Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals. Vol. 8, №1. 397–441. [in English].

Besharov, M.L., Smith, W.K. (2014) Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 39, №3. 364–381. [in English].

Denis, J.-L., Langley, A., Rouleau L. (2007) Strategizing in pluralistic contexts: Rethinking theoretical frames. Human Relations. Vol. 60, №1. 179–215. [in English].

Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J., Mair, J. (2014) The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol. 34. 81–100. [in English].

Haigh, N., Hoffman, A.J. (2012) Hybrid organizations: The next chapter of sustainable business. Organizational Dynamics. Vol. 41, №2. 126–134. [in English].

Jay, J. (2013) Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 56, №1. 137–159. [in English].

Kraatz, M.S., Block, E.S. (2008) Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism/ Eds. R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, K. Sahlin-Andersson. London: Sage, 243–275.

Pache, A.-C., Santos, F. (2013) Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 56, №4. 972–1001. [in English].

Smith, W.K., Gonin, M., Besharov, M.L. (2013) Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly. Vol. 23, №3. 407–442. [in English].

Terepyshchyi, S. (2017) Educational Landscape as a Concept of Philosophy of Education. Studia Warmińskie, Vol. 54, 373-383. [in English].




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26886/2520-7474.5(63)2024.2

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.