PEDAGOGICAL CONDITIONS OF FORMATION OF READINESS OF FUTURE SPECIALISTS OF PHYSICAL CULTURE TO USE OF INNOVATIVE TYPES OF MOTOR ACTIVITY IN PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY
Abstract
We have identified the pedagogical conditions for training future specialists of physical culture and sports to use innovative types of motor activity in professional activities in three dimensions: 1) as factors of formal education – the introduction into the educational process of educational and methodological support for the training of future specialists of physical culture and sports to use innovative types of motor activity in professional activities; 2) as factors of non-formal education: initiation of sections on innovative types of physical activity in a higher education institution for students of non-physical education specialties; organization of competitive activities on innovative types of physical activity in higher education; 3) as factors of informal education – the use of digital visualization technologies in the process of forming the readiness of future specialists of physical culture and sports to use innovative types of motor activity in professional activities.
Keywords: professional training; future specialists of physical culture and sports; pedagogical conditions; innovative types of motor activity.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Bain K. What the Best College Teachers Do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004. 224 p.
Bogdanova I. M. Professional and pedagogical training of future teachers based on the use of innovative technologies: author. dis. for science. degree of cand. ped. science: 13.00.04. Kyiv, 2003. 41 p.
Shandrygos V. I. Computerization of physical education teacher: author. cand. dis. for science degree: 24.00.02. Lviv, 2002. 18 p.
Shapran O. I., Dobroskok I. I., Kotsur V. P., Nikitchina S. O. Innovative pedagogical technologies: theory and practice of use in higher school. Pereyaslav-Khmelnytsky: SV Publishing House Karpuk, 2008. 285 p.
Maurer M. R., Jordan P. J. Steps to a Successful Physical Education Teacher Education Workshop. Physical Educator. 2006. 63 (1). P. 53-56.
Maxcy J. Sport universitaire. NCAA: une gouvernance qui maximise la creation de valeur economique. JuriSport: The Revue Juridique et Economique du Sport (Sport Law and Economics Review). 2013. Vol. 137. P. 42-6.
Metzler M. W. Instructional Models for Physical Education. Minneap.: Prentice Hall, 1999. P. 26–28.
Mould O. Parkour, the City, the Event. Environment and Planning Journals: Society and Space. 2009. Volume: 27. Issue: 4. P. 738 – 750. doi.org/10.1068/d11108
Saville S. J. Playing with fear: parkour and the mobility of emotion. Social & Cultural Geography. Vol. 9. No. 8. 2008. P. 891 – 914.
Strel J., Kovac M., Jurak G. Physical and Motor Development, Sport Activities and Lifestyles of Slovenian Children and Youth – Changes in a Few Decades. International Journal of Physical Education. A Review Publication. 2007. № 4. P. 105–110.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26886/2520-7474.2(46)2020.14
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.