Editorial Policies

Section Policies

DERMATOVENEREOLOGY: GENERAL QUESTIONS

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

NON-CONTAINMENT SKIN DISORDERS

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

CONTAGIOUS DERMATOSES

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

SYPHILIS AND GONORRHOEA

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

OTHER DISEASES PREDOMINANTLY SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

COSMETOLOGY: GENERAL QUESTIONS

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

COSMETOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF SKIN CHANGES

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

TRADITIONAL AND INNOVATIVE COSMETOLOGICAL METHODS

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Double “blind” reviewing

Reviewing is done by highly qualified experts and aims to raise the quality of research articles submitted for publication.

The procedure of reviewing is anonymous for authors and reviewers,it includes a grounded opinion from two independent experts (i.e. double “blind” examination).

The reviewers are supposed to define:

  • if the contents of the article corresponds to the declared title;
  • if the contents of the article corresponds to the profile of the journal;
  • if the contents of the article is new;
  • if the article corresponds to the scientific level of the journal;
  • if it is reasonable to publish the article taking into account the previous literature on the subject and if it may be interesting for a wide range of readers;
  • what sorts of positive and negative features characterize the article, what sorts of corrections can done in case the article has some drawbacks;

4. All articles undergo an electronic test through the program «Advego Plagiatus» with an intuition interface that finds partial and full textual copies in the Internet. Plagiatus show the level of originality and marks a percentage of textual coincidence.

5. Reviews (without the names of the reviewers) are sent to the author (authors) and the articles are revised, basically on points of criticism.