POST-TRUTH AS A COMMUNICATIVE TREND OF MODERNITY

Lidiya Kuzomеnska

Abstract


The phenomenon of post-truthasan imperative element of the communicative system of today has been investigated through the means of analytical, comparative and extrapolative methodology. The risks of avalanche-like growth of information pressure and the challenges of this trend against modern society have been interpreted. The causal relationships of post-truth as a communicative trend of modernity have been analyzed. Specific features of linguistic resources that shape the environment of ontological and instrumental prerequisites for the emergence of post-truth and the further formation of the functional expansionism of this phenomenon have been identified. The need to form a conventionally agreed content array that represents the essential features of post-truth and expresses its subject field has been substantiated. The need to prioritize raising the level of communicative culture as a necessary prerequisite for avoiding abuses in the field of communicative exchange and manupulations by mass consciousness due to parasitism on linguistic and communicative resources has been conceptualized.

Keywords: Post-truth, communication sphere, relationships of cause and effect, postmodern era, informational pressing, criterial relativism.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Rose, T.(2022). Collective Illusions: Conformity, Complicity, and the Science of Why We Make Bad Decisions. Hachette Go, 304.

Byung-Chul, H. (2022). Infocracy: Digitization and the Crisis of Democracy. Polity, 80.

Фуко, М. (1999). Надзирать и наказывать. Рождение тюрьмы. М.: «Аd Marginem», 480.

Badiou, A. (2022). The Immanence of Truths: Being and Event III. Bloomsbury Academic, 624.

Macdonald, H. (2018). Truth: How the Many Sides to Every Story Shape Our Reality. BantamPress, 352.

Pinker, S. (2007). The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 576.

Kaufmann, M. F. (2022). The Quest for the Meta-Language: How Re-inventing Our Language Can Enhance Human Progress. B09W31NSJV, 193.

Слюсаренко, О.(2022). Когерентність науки та освіти в діапазоні від інструментального потенціалу до проблемних факторів функціонування. Modern problems in science. Proceedings of the ХIХ International Scientific and Practical Conference. Vancouver, Canada. 544–550.

Маклюэн, Г. М. (2003).Понимание Медиа : Внешние расширения человека. М. : КАНОН-пресс-Ц; Кучково поле, 464.

Cosentino, G. (2020). Social Media And The Post-Truth World Order: The Global Dynamics Of Disinformation. PalgravePivot, 151.

Самчук, З. (2020). Текст політики на тлі цивілізаційних контекстів і підтекстів як відсутній елемент освітнього дискурсу. Освітній дискурс: збірник наукових праць, № 6. 7–22.

Keyes,R.(2004). The Post-Truth Era: Dishonesty and Deceptionin Contemporary Life. St. Martin’s Press, 312.

Препотенська, М. П. (2020). Мультипотенціали в освітньому дискурсі. Філософіяосвіти. Philosophy of Education, 26(1), 99–112.

Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. University Of Minnesota Press, 144.

Jameson, F. (1992).Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Duke University Press, 460.

Руднев, В. (2000). Прочь от реальности: Исследования по философии текста. М.: «Аграф», 432.

Jensen, K. B. (1986). Making Sense of the News: Towards a Theory and an Empirical Model of Reception for the Study of Mass Communication. Aarhus, Denmark: University of Aarhus Press, 392.

Klapper, J. (1960). The Effects of Mass Communication. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 302.

Bredemeier, K. (2005). Schwarze Rhetorik. Macht und magieder sprache. Mit zahlreichen Übungen. GoldmannVerlag, 256.

Верещагин, О. А., Белова, Н. Е. (2015). Фрейм-аналитика: опыт эпистемологического исследования.Ученые записки Орловского государственного университета. Серия : Гуманитарные и социальные науки. №6 (69). 302–306.

Cienki, A. (2007). Frames, idealized cognitive models, domains. The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. Ed. by D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 170–187.

Gray, B. (2005). Framing in mediation and mediation as framing. M. Herman (Ed.), Mediation from beginning to end. New York: Blackwell, 195-216.

Westby, D. L. (2005). Strategic imperative, ideology, and frames. Frames of protest: social movements and the framing perspective. Ed. by H. Johnston and J. A. Noakes. Lanham : Rowman & Littlefield, 217–235.

Некрасов, С. И., Молчанова, Н. С. (2009). Значение теории фреймов в современной науке. Научные ведомости БГУ. № 16 (71). 14–17.

Якоба, И. А. (2019). Деконструкция технологии «Окно Овертона» в американском медийном дискурсе. Вестник Череповецкого государственного университета. № 5 (92).175–187.

References:

Rose, T.(2022). Collective Illusions: Conformity, Complicity, and the Science of Why We Make Bad Decisions. Hachette Go. [in English].

Byung-Chul, H. (2022). Infocracy: Digitization and the Crisis of Democracy. Polity. [in English].

Fuko, M. (1999). Nadzirat' i nakazyvat'. Rozhdeniye tyur'my[Supervise and punish. The birth of the prison]. M.: «Ad Marginem». [in Russian].

Badiou, A. (2022). The Immanence of Truths: Being and Event III. Bloomsbury Academic.[in English].

Macdonald, H. (2018). Truth : How the Many Sides to Every Story Shape Our Reality. BantamPress. [in English].

Pinker, S. (2007). TheLanguageInstinct: Howthe Mind Creates Language. Harper Perennial Modern Classics. [in English].

Kaufmann, M. F. (2022). The Quest for the Meta-Language: How Re-inventing Our Language Can Enhance Human Progress. B09W31NSJV. [in English].

Slyusarenko, O. (2022). Koherentnistʹ nauky ta osvity v diapazoni vid instrumentalʹnoho potentsialu do problemnykh faktoriv funktsionuvannya [Coherence of science and education in the range from instrumental potential to problematic factors of functioning]. Modern problems in science. Proceedings of the KHIKH International Scientific and Practical Conference. Vancouver, Canada. [in Ukrainian].

Maklyuen, G. M. (2003). Ponimaniye Media: Vneshniye rasshireniya cheloveka[Understanding the Media: Human External Extensions]. M.: KANON-press-TS; Kuchkovo pole. [in Russian].

Cosentino,G. (2020). Social Media And The Post-Truth World Order: The Global Dynamics Of Disinformation. PalgravePivot. [in English].

Samchuk, Z. (2020). Tekst polityky na tli tsyvilizatsiynykh kontekstiv i pidtekstiv yak vidsutniy element osvitnʹoho dyskursu [The policy text against the background of civilizational contexts and subtexts as a missing element of educational discourse]. Osvitniy dyskurs: zbirnyk naukovykh pratsʹ, № 6. [inUkrainian].

Keyes, R. (2004). The Post-Truth Era: Dishonesty and Deception in Contemporary Life. St. Martin’s Press. [in English].

Prepotensʹka, M. P. (2020). Mulʹtypotentsialy v osvitnʹomu dyskursi [Multipotentials in educational discourse]. Filosofiya osvity. Philosophy of Education, 26(1). [inUkrainian].

Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. University Of Minnesota Press. [in English].

Jameson, F. (1992).Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Duke University Press. [in English].

Rudnev, V. (2000). Proch' ot real'nosti: Issledovaniya po filosofii teksta [Away from Reality: Studies in the Philosophy of the Text]. M.: «Agraf». [in Russian].

Jensen, K. B. (1986). Making Sense of the News: Towards a Theory and an Empirical Model of Reception for the Study of Mass Communication. Aarhus, Denmark: University of Aarhus Press. [in English].

Klapper, J. (1960). The Effects of Mass Communication. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. [in English].

Bredemeier, K. (2005). SchwarzeRhetorik. Macht und magieder sprache. Mit zahlreichen Übungen. Goldmann Verlag. [in English].

Vereshchagin, O. A., Belova, N. Ye. (2015). Freym-analitika: opyt epistemologicheskogo issledovaniya [Frame analytics: experience of epistemological research]. Uchenyye zapiski Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya : Gumanitarnyye i sotsial'nyye nauki. №6 (69).[in Russian].

Cienki, A. (2007). Frames, idealized cognitive models, domains. The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. Ed. by D. Geeraerts and H. Cuyckens. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [in English].

Gray, B. (2005). Framing in mediation and mediation as framing. M. Herman (Ed.), Mediation from beginning to end. New York: Blackwell. [in English].

Westby, D. L. (2005). Strategic imperative, ideology, and frames. Frames of protest: social movements and the framing perspective. Ed. by H. Johnston and J. A. Noakes. Lanham : Rowman & Littlefield. [in English].

Nekrasov, S. I., Molchanova, N. S. (2009). Znacheniye teorii freymov v sovremennoy nauke [The value of the theory of frames in modern science]. Nauchnyye vedomosti BGU. № 16 (71).[in Russian].

Yakoba, I. A. (2019). Dekonstruktsiya tekhnologii «Okno Overtona» v amerikanskom mediynom diskurse[Deconstruction of the Overton Window Technology in American Media Discourse]. Vestnik Cherepovetskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. № 5 (92).[in Russian].




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26886/2414-634X.1(53)2022.8

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.