THE “BODY OF THE EARTH” PARADIGM IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN PROCESSES OF GLOBALIZATION

S. Pylypenko

Abstract


The article is devoted to the paradigm body of the Earth, which acquires a new meaning in the context of globalization and technologicalization of modernity. It is noted that the application of this paradigm provides a new idea of the problem of coexistence of man and the Earth. it is emphasized that the realization of the unity of man and the Earth is connected with the creation of new meanings and symbols. It is substantiated that this situation opens up new opportunities for the formation of an ecological paradigm capable of responding to the challenges of the XXI century.

Keywords:body of the Earth, man, ecology, space, globalization.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Александров, Д.В. (2017). Конструктивістська парадигма як філософське підґрунтя сучасної вищої освіти. Освітній дискурс, Вип. 1, 62–75.

Blok, V. (2017). Thin king the Earth: Critical Reflectionson Quentin Meillassoux’s and Heidegger’s Concept of the Earth. Environmental ethics, Vol. 38. 441–462.

Газнюк, Л.М. (2003). Соматичне буття персонального світу особистості. Харків: ХДАФК. 386 с.

Гомілко, О. (2001). Метафізика тілесності. Київ: Наукова думка. 301 с.

Joldersma, C.W. (2018). Ecologizing Philosophy of Education. Education Theory, Vol 67, № 4, 399–415.

Мерло-Понті, М. (2003). Видиме і невидиме: з робочими нотатками. Київ. 255 с.

Шроер, М. (2018). Тілесні простори. Рухливий простір: міждисциплінарна антологія; за ред. К. Міщенко та С. Штретінг. Київ : Арткнига, 74–90.

Haar, M. (1993). Song of the Earth: Heidegger and the foundations of the history of being. Indiana: Indiana University Press. 212 р.

Хайдеггер, М. Исток художественного творения. URL: https://kph.ffs.npu.edu.ua/!e-book/clasik/data/heideg/istok.html.

References:

Aleksandrov, D.V. (2017). Konstruktyvist·s’ka paradyhma yak filosofs’ke pidgruntya suchasnoyi vyshchoyi osvity. Osvitniy dyskurs, 1, 62–75. [in Ukrainian].

Blok, V. (2017). Thin king the Earth: Critical Reflectionson Quentin Meillassoux’s and Heidegger’s Concept of the Earth. Environmental ethics, Vol. 38. 441–462. [in English].

Haznyuk, L.M. (2003). Somatychne buttya personal’noho svitu osobystosti. Kharkiv: KHDAFK. [in Ukrainian].

Homilko, O. (2001). Metafizyka tilesnosti. Kyyiv: Naukova dumka. [in Ukrainian].

Joldersma, C.W. (2018). Ecologizing Philosophy of Education. Education Theory, Vol 67, № 4, 399–415. [in English].

Merlo-Ponti, M. (2003). Vydyme i nevydyme: z robochymy notatkamy. Kyyiv. [in Ukrainian].

Shroer, M. (2018). Tilesni prostory. Rukhlyvyy prostir: mizhdystsyplinarna antolohiya; za red. K. Mishchenko ta S. Shtretinh. Kyyiv: Artknyha, 74–90. [in Ukrainian].

Haar, M. (1993). Song of the Earth: Heidegger and the foundations of the history of being. Indiana: Indiana University Press. [in English].

Khaydegger, M. Istok khudozhestvennogo tvoreniya. URL: https://kph.ffs.npu.edu.ua/!e-book/clasik/data/heideg/istok.html. [in Russian].




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26886/2414-634X.3(47)2021.6

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.