INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE OF THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF GROUP LAWSUITS

T. Oldak

Abstract


The article is devoted to the study of international experience of theoretical and practical aspects of proceedings in class actions. This study will present various models of regulation in this area of the Anglo-Saxon and mixed legal families. By analyzing this legal basis, the practice of application will be possible to establish the essence of the class action in civil proceedings by disclosing the main features that are inherent in it and are such that distinguish it from other procedural structures aimed at protecting violated rights and legitimate interests as effective judicial mechanism.

The subject of the study is issues related to one of the jurisdictional ways to protect the rights and legitimate interests of large groups of people. The purpose of this work is to publish the results of the study, which was conducted as part of a dissertation study on "Group lawsuit in civil proceedings in Ukraine." During the study, a general scientific dialectical method of use was used, which allowed to comprehensively study the main provisions of class action in foreign procedural law and the possibility of its development in the legislation of Ukraine, and provided an opportunity to reveal the nature of class actions in civil proceedings. stages. The scope of application of the results of the development of the theoretical basis in the field of mechanisms for the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of large groups of persons in order to introduce the appropriate procedure in the civil procedure legislation of Ukraine.

Key words: civil proceedings, group lawsuit, initiating plaintiff, numerous groups, litigation proceedings, model "opt-in", "opt-out".


Full Text:

PDF

References


Аболонин Г. О. Практическое применение групповых исков в некоторых странах мира. Вестник гражданского процесса. 2015. № 4. С. 207–261;

Романюк Я. М. Масовий позов: загальна характеристика, зарубіжний досвід і перспективи впровадження в Україні. Вісник Верховного Суду України. 2015. № 3. С. 35–47;

Долганичев В. В. Групповой иск и групповое производство в Германии. Арбитражный и гражданский процесс: науч. - практ. и информ. изд. 2014. № 8. С. 36–40;

Гадомський Д. Інститут групових (класових) позовів як інструмент захисту порушених або оспорюваних прав. Юридичний журнал. 2006. № 10. С. 124–127;

Аварія Боїнга: у США подали позов проти Гіркіна. Корреспондент.net від 25.02.2016. URL: https://ua.korrespondent.net/amp/3634394-avariia-boinha-u-ssha-podaly-pozov-proty-hirkina;

Трамп проти штатів. 16 штатів США подали в суд на Трампа через надзвичайний стан. ВВС News від 19.02.2019. URL: https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/features-47288717;

Американці подали позови проти Китаю на $1,2 трильйона через коронавірус. Укрінформ від 11.04.2020. URL: https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-world/3003461-amerikanci-podali-pozovi-proti-kitau-na-12-triljona-cerez-koronavirus.html;

Аболонин Г. О. Правовой механизм группового иска в США. Вестник гражданского процесса. 2015. № 3. С. 169–252;

Evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of collective redress mechanisms in the European Union: URL: https://dare.uva.nl/search?identifier =accf5d36-68d9-4d18-aaa6-8012b68fed9a;

Норкус Р. Колективний позов у Литві. Юридичний журнал «Право України». 2015. № 9. С. 28–37;

Максименко О. В. Інститут колективного позову як елемент процесуальної співучасті. URL: http://www.rusnauka.com/42_ NIO_2014/Pravo/9_184400.doc.htm;

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 sect 33 C, Supreme Court Act 1986 sect 33C. URL: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2016C00683.

References:

Abolonin G. O. Prakticheskoe primenenie gruppovyh iskov v nekotoryh stranah mira. Vestnik grazhdanskogo processa. 2015. № 4. С. 207–261 [in Ukrainian];

Romanyuk YA. M. Masovij pozov: zagal'na harakteristika, zarubіzhnij dosvіd і perspektivi vprovadzhennya v Ukraїnі. Vіsnik Verhovnogo Sudu Ukraїni. 2015. № 3. С. 35–47 [in Ukrainian].;

Dolganichev V. V. Gruppovoj isk i gruppovoe proizvodstvo v Germanii. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process: nauch. - prakt. i inform. izd. 2014. № 8. С. 36–40 [in Ukrainian];

Gadoms'kij D. Іnstitut grupovih (klasovih) pozovіv yak іnstrument zahistu porushenih abo osporyuvanih prav. Yuridichnij zhurnal. 2006. № 10. С. 124–127 [in Ukrainian];

Avarіya Boїnga: u SSHA podali pozov proti Gіrkіna. Korrespondent.net від 25.02.2016. URL: https://ua.korrespondent.net/amp/3634394-avariia-boinha-u-ssha-podaly-pozov-proty-hirkina [in Ukrainian];

Tramp proti shtatіv. 16 shtatіv SSHA podali v sud na Trampa cherez nadzvichajnij stan. ВВС News від 19.02.2019. URL: https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/features-47288717 [in Ukrainian];

Amerikancі podali pozovi proti Kitayu na $1,2 tril'jona cherez koronavіrus. Ukrіnform від 11.04.2020. URL: https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-world/3003461-amerikanci-podali-pozovi-proti-kitau-na-12-triljona-cerez-koronavirus.html [in Ukrainian];

Abolonin G. O. Pravovoj mekhanizm gruppovogo iska v SSHA. Vestnik grazhdanskogo processa. 2015. № 3. С. 169–252 [in Ukrainian];

Evaluation of the effectiveness and efficiency of collective redress mechanisms in the European Union: URL: https://dare.uva.nl/search?identifier=accf5d36-68d9-4d18-aaa6-8012b68fed9a [in English];

Norkus R. Kolektivnij pozov u Litvі. Yuridichnij zhurnal «Pravo Ukrainа». 2015. № 9. С. 28–37 [in Ukrainian].;

Maksimenko O. V. Іnstitut kolektivnogo pozovu yak element procesual'noї spіvuchastі. URL: http://www.rusnauka.com/42_ NIO_2014/Pravo/9_184400.doc.htm [in Ukrainian];

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 sect 33 C, Supreme Court Act 1986 sect 33C. URL: https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2016C00683 [in English].




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26886/2414-634X.6(42)2020.6

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.