PERSONALITY TYPES AND FORMS OF POLITICAL REGIMES IN THE CONTEXT OF MENTAL MANIPULATIONS
Abstract
The article is devoted to the philosophical analysis of the links between personality types and ways of mental manipulations in the context of different political regimes. The methodological background of the research is the cognitive approach. The forms of manipulation of the consciousness of the personality have been revealed depending on the characteristics of political regimes (democratic, authoritarian, totalitarian forms of the social mechanism of manipulation of the personality consciousness). It has been concluded that each of three main forms of political regimes (democratic, authoritarian and totalitarian regimes) has its specific features of mind manipulation and corresponds to a certain personality type (socially active, transitional and socially passive type respectively).
Key words: Personality, Personality Types, Society, Politics, Political Regime, Consciousness, Manipulation.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Berger P.L. (1969). The Social Reality of Religion. London, Faber and Faber, 239.
Billig M., Marinho С. (2014). Manipulating information and manipulation people: Examples from the 2004 Portuguese Parliamentary Celebration of the April Revolution, M. Billing, C. Marinho. Critical Discourse Studies, 11(2), 158–174.
Kara-Murza S., Smirnov S. (2009). Manipulation of consciousness. M., Eksmo, Algorithm, 528. [in Russian].
Kolesnikova G.I. (2014). The social mechanism of personality consciousness manipulation. M., DirectMEDIA, 272. [in Russian]
Lazarsfel’d P. (1991). Personal influence. Tomsk, Vodoley. [in Russian].
Petty R.E., Cacioppo J.T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. N.Y., Springer-Verlag, 262.
Riker W.H. (1986). The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 153.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26886/2414-634X.6(33)2019.9
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.