Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Topics: the journal publishes scientific reviews, articles of issue-related and research and practice nature in economics, sociology, agriculture and forestry, engineering sciences, medicine, physical culture and sport, construction and architecture, psychology and pedagogy.

 

Section Policies

ECONOMICS

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

POLITICS

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

HISTORY

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

MEDICINE

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

TECHNICAL SCIENCES

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

PEDAGOGY

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

PSYCHOLOGY

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

PHILOSOPHY

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

LAW

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Double “blind” reviewing

Reviewing is done by highly qualified experts and aims to raise the quality of research articles submitted for publication.

The procedure of reviewing is anonymous for authors and reviewers,it includes a grounded opinion from two independent experts (i.e. double “blind” examination).

The reviewers are supposed to define:

  • if the contents of the article corresponds to the declared title;
  • if the contents of the article corresponds to the profile of the journal;
  • if the contents of the article is new;
  • if the article corresponds to the scientific level of the journal;
  • if it is reasonable to publish the article taking into account the previous literature on the subject and if it may be interesting for a wide range of readers;
  • what sorts of positive and negative features characterize the article, what sorts of corrections can done in case the article has some drawbacks;

4. All articles undergo an electronic test through the program «Advego Plagiatus» with an intuition interface that finds partial and full textual copies in the Internet. Plagiatus show the level of originality and marks a percentage of textual coincidence.

5. Reviews (without the names of the reviewers) are sent to the author (authors) and the articles are revised, basically on points of criticism.

 

INDEXING

Индексация журнала

Индексация журнала

 

Publikation ethics

Within the editorial policy a collection "INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS IN MODERN SCIENCE" stick consecutively to publishing standards of COPE Code of Conduct publications, approved by COP (Committee on Publication Ethics).

Materials are reviewed by members of the journal editorial board and/or by the external independent experts on the basis of objectivity and from the standpoint of the higher international academic quality standards, and edited.

Editorial board reserves the right for stylistic alteration of the typescript.

Corrections are coordinated with the author which, in the opinion of the editorial board, can change the meaning of the text.

The editorial board of the scientific publication reserves the right to reject articles that do not meet requirements and topics of the collection. "

Opinions and proposals expressed in articles do not necessarily coincide with the Editorial Board views. Reliability of the information in the articles, the accuracy of the names, statistics, surnames and citations are under the author′s responsibility.

The editors reserve the right for minor literary wording of texts and abridgements with the author's style retention.

Provided materials are not returned and can not be published in other scientific journals.

In cases of plagiarism authors are responsible for provided materials.